What's new
Honda Trail 125 Forum

Welcome to the Honda Trail 125 Forum! We are an enthusiast forum for the Trail 125, Hunter Cub, CT125 or whatever it's called in your country. Feel free to join up and help us build an information resources for this motorcycle. Register a free account today to become a member. Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

YSS fork spring upgrade kit. Y-FCM20-KIT-01-030

kevvyd

Active member
Joined
Nov 17, 2024
Messages
92
Location
E. City, MD
Hey all,

I had installed the kit referenced in this posts' title and thought it was terrible!
Honestly, I thought it was worse than stock. While the ability to pre-load the springs was desperately needed. The hydraulic damping was incredibly harsh at initial movement, but still blew though a lot of travel, AND still exhibited awful brake dive.
I went back into the forks a couple of times and changed the preload on the PD Valve (emulator, aka generic Race Tech Gold Valve....and yeah I know RT did not invent the emulator. But they are the most well known)
I also did 10, 15, &20wt oil swaps to little improvement. Tried a few different oil heights too....didn't matter much until you get toward "too low/little" oil, at which point you could tell the oil readily cavitated.
I had enough and decided experimenting was concluded. The YSS Kit simply sucked, and I rode it that way for 1000 or so miles all the while dreading it and hating the notion of going back to stock and admitting I had wasted my time and money.

Then I was building out (another) pitbike(TTR125) and I was considering installing some RT Gold Valves like I have in some of my other pitbikes (KLX140) and I remembered that Race Tech installation instructions include a process where you enlarge and ADD holes to the damper rods-----"thereby passing all of the VALVING duties to the Gold Valve (emulator/PD Valve/et al) allowing unrestricted free flow of the oil up the damper rod without the restriction of the tiny OEM compression damping orfices.
.....and a light bulb ignited in my head.
If the oil had to FIRST pass through the restricted OEM orfice before it slams into the PD Valve mechanical valve (emulator)---Then you've probably quadrupled the restriction of oil flow on the Compression side of the damping circuit. Also when the oil makes it up to the PD Valve (emulator) it'd be moving low volume/high pressure, which is often more harsh than high volume/lower pressure valving.
Nowhere in the YSS instructions do they tell you about enlarging, or adding, the OEM compression damping orfices in the rods.
But I thought (I knew) that this had to be done in order for the system to not have excessive restriction. AKA harshness.

Fortunately the fork damping rods for CT125 are cheap (like $6 ea.) and readily available, so I ordered a pair and modified them per Race Tech Gold Valve instructions. I installed the newly Modified damper rods, then reinstalled the rest of the YSS kit. This time setting the PV Valve to approximately "3ish Full turns" preload on the PD Valve spring, whereas I had been running it with nearly zero preload with the unmodified damper rods seeking more plushness. The "3ish turns" decision was also inspired by reviewing some Race Tech DVS setup sheets from other kits I'd done.
The fork was refilled with 20wt and set to the 140mm height specified by Honda rather than the 185mm spec suggested in the YSS instructions. Again, oil cavitation seemed more perceivable at the lower (185mm) oil height
(15wt might be better, jury out still)
I put about 3mm (3 turns) spring preload on the adjusters even though I carry very little cargo and weigh only 165 lbs.

I took it out for a test ride on a nearby high-speed run that I know has really shitty asphalt.....holes, surface changes, joints, sunken manholes. I know the road well and usually dodge as many of these "features" as possible on my commutes from home......but not on this ride.
OMG, it was incredible!
The difference was staggering!
The bike was very supple and balanced over some "big hits" at speed.
The dive when the front brake are applied was reduced by probably 75%. (aka GREAT, problem solved)
It felt very planted, smooth, and stable. Everything you want really!
Planted like the size of the tires on the bike had doubled and you just have more cushion.
Being greedy.....I took most of the fork mainspring preload that I had preemptively applied back out to nearly zero turns on the external top adjuster. And it did indeed ride softer....
The stability and consistency was noticeable as I banged a couple aggressive 90* turns.....no mid-turn adjustment required or "unsettled-ness". I was shocked at the benefit in this aspect.
The "goodness" of the front suspension highlighted how terrible the rear is!

I might go back down to 15wt, or take 1-turn off the preload off the PD Valve (internal) as I thought it might be a little slow on rebound, and could probably be fine with slightly less Compression damping.
Otherwise it is fantastic. I definitely could leave it "as is" and be totally pleased. If there is a 100%-------I got 85% right out the gate.
Very happy right now.

Photos are: Product, Race Tech Suggestions, Unmodified Damper rod, Modified Damper rod
Screenshot 2025-06-23 at 11.41.40 PM.pngImage 5-27-25 at 10.32 PM.jpegIMG_8820.JPGIMG_8816.JPG
 
Last edited:

Tarjad

New member
Joined
Jul 12, 2023
Messages
2
Interesting. Has anyone that you know of tried a lighter weight oil to reduce the effectiveness of the oem damper rod? That is what Cogent does with their emulators on my DR650 and XT250, works a treat.
 
Last edited:

DeadguyAle

Member
Joined
May 27, 2025
Messages
24
Location
Cathlamet,Wa
Nice write up @kevvyd
I've got the RacingBros fork upgrade kit with the Grom lowering springs to replace the spacer tubes. Expect that there is no real difference in the valves between the different vendors other than color.
RacingBros instructions do not mention drilling out the damper rod either but what you detailed in your post makes sense.
Thinking about trying a 5wt or 10wt oil first based on the info @Tarjad supplied just to see how it works.
Went ahead and ordered new rods from PartsZilla (only $3.85 each) if I decide to go the drilling route.
I see several disassemblies reassemblies in my future unless I get lucky on the first try:p
 

kevvyd

Active member
Joined
Nov 17, 2024
Messages
92
Location
E. City, MD
@DeadguyAle

1: Interesting and valid point what @Tarjad mentioned in regard to how Cogent chooses to get their emulator to function well without enlarging/adding compression holes.
(my brain gets so caught up in everybody running higher viscosity oils in crummy damping rod forks that it never even dawned on me that lower viscosity would in fact make its way through those small OEM compression holes more readily.).
Cogent is all very handmade/engineered/bespoke, so perhaps something in the "valving" of his emulator is a little more unique and proprietary than the Chinese knock off stuff we're working with? Just thinking aloud/speculating.

2: Do you know the overall (free) length of the Racing Bros GROM lowering springs? AND, their claimed spring rate?
(Something about me hates a spacer tube as well😄)
 

DeadguyAle

Member
Joined
May 27, 2025
Messages
24
Location
Cathlamet,Wa
@kevvyd
Springs are 3.5" long, have not found any specifications as to the spring rate other than "really stiff" I can barely compress by hand. I'll get a diameter measurement of the wire used, might be able to get a general idea of the rate from that.

https://www.steadygarage.com/produc...ckus-metropolitan?_pos=1&_sid=61d0bf091&_ss=r
NOTE for RacingBros Anti Drive Kit - Honda Trail 125 (CT125)
This kit will also work with RBROS-1060 as an helper spring. This kit will replace the long RacingBros Aluminum spacer entirely (included spacers + springs). This kit would allow additional suspension travel for the Racing Bros Front Anti Dive Kits for the Honda Trail 125 CT125.
 
Top