I am getting a lot more crushed and opened packages from UPS these days. This was thrown on my porch and the ups guy literally ran back to his truck.
Same for me actually. I didn't think much of it until you brought it up. I had two parts arriving, a fragile piece of equipment and my dog's medication - the medication was crushed, but thankfully didn't need that level of care. I have a decent amount of compassion for them. The wages and working conditions aren't great, and I generally only order from places with excellent returns policies. I also photograph any external damage to the package before I open it, for the reasons of returns.
Funnily, this is a highly philosophical debate amongst my friends for what to do in this situation. We're talking about UPS here but the generalized statement applies to any quality over time situation, such as toxic players in MMORPGs, quality control in honda shifters, etc. They only report the most egregious actions, while I report everything (if the system exists I even will comment saying that things were delivered well). I have evidence that their thought process is correct but flawed, and mine's correct but not directly actionable (if this were chemistry, I am more of a catalyst than an active component). People like me generally result in identifying issues earlier and low hanging fruits, while people like them generally result in identifying high impact issues.
The main difference in philosophy is probably that I've been on teams that have built 4 of those computing systems and several tutorials for my old company on how to do data analytics on "flaky" data and different models that can be used to optimize systems in different ways to prevent it impacting overall system performance.